Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Clue

But that's kind of cowardly too - I've read papers and articles making what I assume is the same case. 109D: Novy ___, Russian literary magazine (MIR) — this clue suggests an awareness that the puzzle was too easy and needed toughening up. After tossing out some possibilities, he concludes that he doesn't really need to be able to identify a plausible mechanism, because "white supremacy touches on so many aspects of American life that it's irresponsible to believe we have adequately controlled for it", no matter how many studies we do or how many confounders we eliminate.

1. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue crossword solver
2. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword club.fr
3. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue stash seeker
4. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue today
5. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue puzzle
6. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue smidgen

Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Clue Crossword Solver

All show that differences in intelligence and many other traits are more due to genes than specific environment. EXCESSIVE T. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue crossword solver. RIFFS). 15D: Explorer who claimed Louisiana for France (LASALLE) — I know him only as the eponym of a university. Ending child hunger, removing lead from the environment, and similar humanitarian programs can do a little more, but only a little. Hopefully I've given people enough ammunition against me that they won't have to use hallucinatory ammunition in the future. DeBoer is aware of this and his book argues against it adeptly.

Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Club.Fr

Even the phrase "high school dropout" has an aura of personal failure about it, in a way totally absent from "kid who always lost at Little League". He could have reviewed studies about whether racial differences in intelligence are genetic or environmental, come to some conclusion or not, but emphasized that it doesn't matter, and even if it's 100% genetic it has no bearing at all on the need for racial equality and racial justice, that one race having a slightly higher IQ than another doesn't make them "superior" any more than Pygmies' genetic short stature makes them "inferior". Some people wrote me to complain that I handled this in a cowardly way - I showed that the specific thing the journalist quoted wasn't a reference to The Bell Curve, but I never answered the broader question of what I thought of the book. 32A: Workers in a global peace organization? And the benefits to parents would be just as large. Well, the most direct answer is that I've never read it. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue today. The district that wanted to save money, so it banned teachers from turning the heat above 50 degrees in the depths of winter. Otherwise, the grid is a cinch. DeBoer agrees conservatives can be satisfied with this, but thinks leftists shouldn't be. — noir film in three letters pretty much Has to be this. Obviously I would want this system to be entirely made of charter schools, so that children and parents can check which ones aren't abusive and prefentially go to those. I don't think totally unstructured learning is optimal for kids - I don't even think Montessori-style faux unstructured learning is optimal - but I think there would be a lot of room to experiment, and I think it would be better to err on the side of not getting angry at kids for trying to learn things on their own than on the side of continuing to do so. There's the kid who locks herself in the bathroom every morning so her parents can't drag her to child prison, and her parents stand outside the bathroom door to yell at her for hours until she finally gives in and goes, and everyone is trying to medicate her or figure out how to remove the bathroom locks, and THEY ARE SOLVING THE WRONG PROBLEM.

Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Clue Stash Seeker

The intuition behind meritocracy is: if your life depends on a difficult surgery, would you prefer the hospital hire a surgeon who aced medical school, or a surgeon who had to complete remedial training to barely scrape by with a C-? DeBoer's answer: by lying. At the time, I noted that meritocracy has nothing to do with this. Access to the 20% is gated by college degree, and their legitimizing myth is that their education makes them more qualified and humane than the rest of us. Schools can change your intellectual potential a limited amount. But at least here and now, most outcomes depend more on genes than on educational quality. But that means some children will always fail to meet "the standards"; in fact, this might even be true by definition if we set the standards according to some algorithm where if every child always passed they would be too low. Instead, he thinks it just produces another hierarchy - maybe one based on intelligence rather than whatever else, but a hierarchy nonetheless. Its supporters credit it with showing "what you can accomplish when you are free from the regulations and mindsets that have taken over education, and do things in a different way. Although he is a little coy about the implications, he refers to several studies showing that having more intelligent teachers improves student outcomes.

Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Clue Today

If we ever figure out how to teach kids things, I'm also okay using these efficiency gains to teach children more stuff, rather than to shorten the school day, but I must insist we figure out how to teach kids things first. If someone found proof-positive that prisons didn't prevent any crimes at all, but still suggested that we should keep sending people there, because it means we'd have "fewer middle-aged people on the streets" and "fewer adults forced to go home to empty apartments and houses", then MAYBE YOU WOULD START TO UNDERSTAND HOW I FEEL ABOUT SENDING PEOPLE TO SCHOOL FOR THE SAME REASON. For lack of any better politically-palatable way to solve poverty, this has kind of become a totem: get better schools, and all those unemployed Appalachian coal miners can move to Silicon Valley and start tech companies. The Part About There Being A Cult Of Smart.

Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Clue Puzzle

I think I'm just struck by the double standard. 59A: Drinker's problem (DTs) — Everything I know about SOTS I learned from crosswords, including the DTs. Opposition to the 20% is usually right-coded; describe them as "woke coastal elites who dominate academia and the media", and the Trump campaign ad almost writes itself. Any remaining advantage is due to "teacher tourism", where ultra-bright Ivy League grads who want a "taste of the real world" go to teach at private schools for a year or two before going into their permanent career as consultants or something. He could have written a chapter about race that reinforced this message. But the opposite is true of high-IQ. 26A: 1950 noir film ("D. O. ") School forces children to be confined in an uninhabitable environment, restrained from moving, and psychologically tortured in a state of profound sleep deprivation, under pain of imprisoning their parents if they refuse. I'll take that over something ugly and arcane, or a rarely used abbrev., any day. Even 100 years ago it was not uncommon for a child to spend his days engaged in backbreaking physical labor. ) Some reviewers of this book are still suspicious, wondering if he might be hiding his real position. Success Academy itself claims that they have lots of innovative teaching methods and a different administrative culture. If people are stuck in boring McJobs, it's because they're not well-educated enough to be surgeons and rocket scientists.

Treats Very Unfairly In Slang Nyt Crossword Clue Smidgen

Then he goes on to, at great length, denounce as loathsome and villainous anyone who might suspect these gaps of being genetic. I don't like actual prisons, the ones for criminals, but I will say this for them - people keep them around because they honestly believe they prevent crime. That would be... what? The astute among you will notice this last one is more of a wish than a policy - don't blame me, I'm just the reviewer). I don't think this is a small effect - consider the difference between competent vs. incompetent teachers, doctors, and lawmakers. Admit to being a member of Mensa, and you'll get a fusillade of "IQ is just a number! " Apparently, Hitler and diabetes *can* be in the puzzle *if* they are being made fun of or their potency is being undermined. Of Sal Paradise's return trip on "On the Road" (ENE) — possibly the most elaborate dir. If white supremacists wanted to make a rule that only white people could hold high-paying positions, on what grounds (besides symbolic ones) could DeBoer oppose them? If they could get $12, 000 - $30, 000 to stay home and help teach their kid, how many working parents might decide they didn't have to take that second job in order to make ends meet? When charter schools have excelled, it's usually been by only accepting the easiest students (they're not allowed to do this openly, but have ways to do it covertly), then attributing their great test scores to novel teaching methods. What is the moral utility of increased social mobility (more people rising up and sliding down in the socioeconomic sorting system) from a progressive perpsective? It's not getting worse by international standards: America's PISA rankings are mediocre, but the country has always scored near the bottom of international rankings, even back in the 50s and 60s when we were kicking Soviet ass and landing men on the moon.

The Cult Of Smart invites comparisons with Bryan Caplan's The Case Against Education. Honestly, it *sounds* pejorative. If you're making fun / being hopeful, OK, but if you're serious (or, in the case of diabetes, somewhat more realistic about its impact on public health and the costs thereof), no no no. I can say with absolute confidence that I would gladly do another four years of residency if the only alternative was another four years of high school. For one, we'd have fewer young people on the street, fewer latchkey children forced to go home to empty apartments and houses, fewer children with nothing to do but stare at screens all day. Race and gender gaps are stable or decreasing. The one that I found is small-n, short timescale, and a little ambiguous, but I think basically supports the contention that there's something there beyond selection bias. But it doesn't scale (there are only so many Ivy League grads willing to accept low salaries for a year or two in order to have a fun time teaching children), and it only works in places like New York (Ivy League grads would not go to North Dakota no matter how fun a time they were promised). Fourth, burn all charter schools (he doesn't actually say "burn", but you can tell he fantasizes about it). DeBoer does make things hard for himself by focusing on two of the most successful charter school experiments. But some Marxists flirt with it too; the book references Elizabeth Currid-Halkett's Theory Of The Aspirational Class, and you can hear echoes of this every time Twitter socialists criticize "Vox liberals" or something. Natural talent is just as unearned as class, race, or any other unfair advantage.

So higher intelligence leads to more money. I am going to get angry and write whole sentences in capital letters. If it doesn't, you might as well replace it with something less traumatizing, like child labor. So we live in this odd situation where we are happy (apparently) to be reminded of the existence of murderous tyrants and widespread, increasing, potentially lethal diseases... just don't put them in the grid, please. The Part About Social Mobility Not Mattering Because It Doesn't Produce Equality. DeBoer thinks the deification of school-achievement-compatible intelligence as highest good serves their class interest; "equality of opportunity" means we should ignore all other human distinctions in favor of the one that our ruling class happens to excel at. I can't find any expert surveys giving the expected result that they all agree this is dumb and definitely 100% environment and we can move on (I'd be very relieved if anybody could find those, or if they could explain why the ones I found were fake studies or fake experts or a biased sample, or explain how I'm misreading them or that they otherwise shouldn't be trusted. DeBoer starts with the standard narrative of The Failing State Of American Education.

I think DeBoer would argue he's not against improving schools. I also have a more fundamental piece of criticism: even if charter schools' test scores were exactly the same as public schools', I think they would be more morally acceptable. But as with all institutions, I would want it to be considered a fall-back for rare cases with no better options, much like how nursing homes are only for seniors who don't have anyone else to take care of them and can't take care of themselves. Socialist blogger Freddie DeBoer is the opposite: few allies, but deeply respected by his enemies. Both use largely the same studies to argue that education doesn't do as much as we thought. For decades, politicians of both parties have thought of education as "the great leveller" and the key to solving poverty. If you can make your system less miserable, make your system less miserable! Individual people (particularly those who think of themselves as talented) might surely prefer higher social mobility because they want to ascend up the ladder of reward.

108A: Typical termite in a California city? DeBoer spends several impassioned sections explaining how opposed he is to scientific racism, and arguing that the belief that individual-level IQ differences are partly genetic doesn't imply a belief that group-level IQ differences are partly genetic. 94A: Steps that a farmer might take (STILE) — another word I'm pretty sure I learned from crosswords. How could these massive overall social changes possibly be replicated elsewhere? One of the most profound and important ways that we've expanded the assumed responsibilities of society lies in our system of public education. Summary and commentary on The Cult Of Smart by Fredrik DeBoer. The appeal for the left is much harder to sort out. Unlike Success Academy, this can't be selection bias (it was every student in the city), and you can't argue it doesn't scale (it scaled to an entire city!

He is not a fan of freezing-cold classrooms or sleep deprivation or bullying or bathroom passes. I can assure you he is not.

Sun, 02 Jun 2024 11:27:15 +0000